Friday, June 19, 2009

DRANT # 329: IRAN HOAX


U been duped bro.
This is a CIA op.
You can tell easy- nice new green headbands, and pre printed three foot high banners.
Can you say 1953 ?
Please take a step back, and look at this scenario--
The Orange was nice in Ukraine, and the Rose in Georgia was really cool too, but I think its so groovy that the CIA picked green this time.
Please turn your bullshit detector up a few notches.
Why would some pro Ahmadinjad agent kill a protestor, if they, as obviously they do- know full well that it would cause a funeral and another demo ?
Kermit Roosevelt would fit right in here.....
Its obvious that the CIA, as in 1953, as in Ukraine and Georgia, are fomenting and aiding and abetting this, with their Tontoesque pimp media. The media is not "getting it wrong", they are - once again, the puppet partners of the CIA and US interests.
Shucks, I guess we'll just have to go there and restore democracy, goshdarnit.
Maybe Israel will help ?
Ubetcha they will.
===

The CIA's Iranian Plan?
Video
Is the CIA involved in Iran's recent election unrest.
===

In case you missed it Effects of ill-advised CIA plot in Iran still haunts U.S.

By John M. Crisp
I suspect that the average American has never heard of Mohammad Mossadegh and Operation Ajax.
===





























































Wishful thinking from Tehran

Since the revolution, academics and pundits have predicted the collapse
of the Iranian regime. This week, they did no better



















Abbas Barzegar


guardian.co.uk,
Saturday 13 June 2009 11.40 BST
===
Charting Western Omniscience
In Post-Elections Iran
By Ali Jawad

Come the Iranian elections and the unexpected landslide victory in favour of Ahmedinejad, and once again rushing to enlighten the world are the normatively 'All-Knowing' Western capitals and media pundits. Swarming the airwaves, one and all cried out 'fraud', 'stolen elections' and a 'nation's will silenced'
===
Iran: Election Clashes Mount As West Escalates Pressure
By Bill Van Auken

Mousavi's so-called reforms were pitched largely to a relatively privileged and narrow social base. The reforms themselves consisted essentially of a toning down of the rhetoric employed by Ahmadinejad in order to smooth the way to improved relations with Washington, an easing of US-backed sanctions and the opening up of the country to foreign capital
===
Are You Ready For War With Demonized Iran?

By Paul Craig Roberts
How much attention do elections in Japan, India, Argentina, or any other country, get from the US media? How many Americans and American journalists even know who is in political office in other countries besides England, France, and Germany? Who can name the political leaders of Switzerland, Holland, Brazil, Japan, or even China? Yet, many know of Iran's President Ahmadinejad. The reason is obvious. He is daily demonized in the US media.
===

The "Bomb Iran" Contingent's Newfound Concern for The Iranian People

By Glenn Greenwald

Much of the same faction now claiming such concern for the welfare of The Iranian People are the same people who have long been advocating a military attack on Iran and the dropping of large numbers of bombs on their country -- actions which would result in the slaughter of many of those very same Iranian People.
===
Ahmadinejad Won. Get Over It

By FLYNT LEVERETT AND HILLARY MANN LEVERETT

The shock of the "Iran experts" over Friday's results is entirely self-generated, based on their preferred assumptions and wishful thinking.
===
Rafsanjani's Gambit Backfires

By M K Bhadrakumar

Who is Mir Hossein Mousavi, Ahmedinejad's main opponent in the election? He is an enigma wrapped in mystery. He impressed the Iranian youth and the urban middle class as a reformer and a modernist. Yet, as Iran's prime minister during 1981-89, Mousavi was an unvarnished hardliner.
===

The Larger Context of the 2009 Iranian Elections

By Reza Fiyouzat

The presidential elections of June 12 were held within a theocratic system. In this system, in order to run for a political office, candidates must swear allegiance to the theocratic setup. From its inception, therefore, the theocracy has divided the entire population into two major political groups.

===

No comments: